![Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?](https://www.berlinertageblatt.de/media/shared/articles/95/a8/g0/Did-cuts-to-shipping-emissions-spur-362039.jpg)
-
YouTube, the online video powerhouse, turns 20
-
Playgrounds come alive again with Brazil school phone ban
-
'So fast': NY subway shove survivor captures commuter fears
-
Could a climate megaproject cloud Chile's unparalleled views of universe?
-
Trump's tariff tactics may reshape global trade: analysts
-
Trump warns 'all hell' will break loose if Gaza hostages not returned
-
Trump warns of 'all hell' if Gaza captives not freed by Saturday
-
Trump signs executive orders on steel, aluminum tariffs
-
Elon Musk heads group trying to buy control of OpenAI: report
-
Young, Irving replace Giannis, Davis in NBA All-Star line-ups
-
US judges challenge Trump cuts as legal battles mount
-
Celtic's Maeda cleared to face Bayern Munich
-
Global stock markets brush off latest Trump tariffs
-
Union sues over US consumer protection agency work pause
-
Inter a point behind leaders Napoli after squeezing past Fiorentina
-
Palace sink Doncaster to book clash with rivals Millwall
-
Ntamack banned for Italy game despite France efforts
-
Duterte's future in balance as Philippine election season kicks off
-
At least 55 dead after Guatemala bus plunges into ravine
-
Ronaldo reaches deal with Saudi club Al Nassr to extend contract: source
-
Man City still worst opponent for Real Madrid, says Ancelotti
-
Trump team orders work pause at US consumer protection agency
-
'Just not ready' - Tiger Woods pulls out of Torrey Pines tournament
-
Zelensky to meet JD Vance in Munich on Friday: Kyiv presidency
-
Church of England meets amid 'crisis' over abuse scandals
-
Macron vows at summit France to 'deliver' on AI acceleration
-
NY jury hears attacker 'dangerously close' to killing Salman Rushdie
-
Steel at heart of new Trump trade war
-
Hamas says stops Gaza hostage release 'until further notice'
-
Cycling: five rough diamonds who dream of being the new Pogacar
-
'I don't have time': Mother of jailed UK-Egyptian makes Starmer plea
-
Feyenoord coach Priske pays for 'lack of chemistry'
-
White S. Africans clamour for US resettlement after Trump order
-
Kanye West's account on X goes dark after hate-filled rant
-
US federal workers weigh Trump buyout as court to step in
-
Global stocks markets brush off Trump tariffs
-
Venice extends tourist tax for 2025
-
McDonald's profits dented by food poisoning outbreak
-
Six arrested after migrants' bodies found on French beach
-
Mikaela Shiffrin: World Ski Championships throwback
-
NY jury hears attacker repeatedly stabbed Salman Rushdie
-
Labour impact and trade windfall on agenda at Paris AI summit
-
At least 51 dead after Guatemala bus plunges into ravine
-
Almost half of remote French island hit by wildfire: official
-
Trump: Palestinians have no right of return under Gaza plan
-
Trump to impose new 25% tariffs on steel, aluminum
-
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
-
British Open announces place for LIV Golf player
-
Swiatek starts bid for fourth straight Doha title with comfortable win
-
Global stocks markets push higher despite more Trump tariffs
![Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?](https://www.berlinertageblatt.de/media/shared/articles/95/a8/g0/Did-cuts-to-shipping-emissions-spur-362039.jpg)
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?
The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.
But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.
This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.
- Why did shipping emissions drop? -
On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.
This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.
Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.
Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.
- Is it working? -
The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.
Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.
The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.
Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.
- Is there a link to global warming? -
Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.
On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.
The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)
He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.
Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.
One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.
The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.
H.Seidel--BTB