-
Dutch flower industry grasps thorny pesticide issue
-
Solar boom counters power shortages in Niger
-
Malnourished children in Afghanistan at 'high risk of dying' without US aid
-
Skating comeback queen Liu says she can get even better for Olympics
-
'Let's rock': world music icon Youssou N'Dour back on the road
-
Mackerel and missiles: EU-UK defence deal snags on fish
-
Istanbul's Hagia Sophia prepares for next big quake
-
'Magician' Chahal casts spell with IPL heroics
-
WHO countries strike landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics
-
Kerr salutes Harvard defiance over Trump after Warriors win
-
Canada party leaders hold high-stakes debate two weeks from vote
-
As war grinds on, Ukraine's seniors suffer
-
ASML CEO sees 'increased macro uncertainty' from tariffs
-
Pope leaves faithful guessing over Easter appearances
-
Butler, 'Batman' Curry shine as Warriors down Grizzlies to reach playoffs
-
Skating 'Quad God' Malinin ready for Olympic favourite tag
-
Toppmoeller has ascendant Frankfurt challenging their limits
-
Cambodia's Chinese casino city bets big on Beijing
-
Vespa love affair: Indonesians turn vintage scooters electric
-
Europe seeks to break its US tech addiction
-
Long-abandoned Welsh mine revived as gold prices soar
-
UK's top court to rule on how to define a 'woman'
-
WHO countries reach landmark agreement on tackling future pandemics
-
Stocks struggle again as Nvidia chip curb warning pops calm
-
China's economy beats forecasts ahead of Trump's 'Liberation Day'
-
China's economy beat forecasts in first quarter ahead of Trump's 'Liberation Day'
-
Trump orders critical minerals probe that may bring new tariffs
-
Onana faces date with destiny as Man Utd chase Lyon win
-
Lessons in horror with Cambodia's Khmer Rouge tribunal
-
Pandemic agreement: key points
-
Paramilitaries declare rival government as Sudan war hits two-year mark
-
Landmark agreement reached at WHO over tackling future pandemics
-
'La bolita,' Cuban lottery offering hope in tough times
-
'Toxic beauty': Rise of 'looksmaxxing' influencers
-
Facebook added 'value' to Instagram, Zuckerberg tells antitrust trial
-
Trump signs order aimed at lowering drug prices
-
Paramilitaries declare rival government as Sudan war enters third year
-
Nvidia expects $5.5 bn hit as US targets chips sent to China
-
Emery targets 'next step' for Aston Villa after Champions League heroics
-
'Gap too big' for Dortmund after first leg, says Guirassy
-
Maradona's daughter says doctors could have prevented his death
-
Barcelona 'justified' semi-final spot despite Dortmund loss, says Flick
-
'We thought the tie was over': Dembele admits PSG switched off against Villa
-
Wine consumption falls heavily into the red
-
Barca through to Champions League semis despite Guirassy hat-trick
-
Global stocks mixed amid lingering unease over trade war
-
PSG survive Aston Villa scare to reach Champions League semis
-
Pandemic treaty talks fight late hurdles
-
Trump resurrects ghost of US military bases in Panama
-
Family seeks homicide charges against owners of collapsed Dominican nightclub
China, Trump, and the power of war?
As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.
Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions
Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.
Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.
Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.
The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response
Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.
Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.
Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.
Potential Military Scenarios
Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.
Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.
Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.
Risks and Global Ramifications
Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.
Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.
International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.
Diplomatic Alternatives
Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.
Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.
In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.

King Charles III promises 'lifelong service' to the Nation

The Queen: From Churchill to Yeltsin and Tito to Trudeau

Queen Elizabeth II dies aged 96

Ukraine: Kherson, nuclear inspectors and Russian army

Why Lithuania didn't join the tributes to Gorbachev

Germany: River Rhine water levels could fall to critical low
